Shannon Bream Takes Down Tim Walz on Border, Abortion, and His ‘Misspeaking’ in Fiery Fox Interview

0
591

The Democrats must be worried because Tim Walz and Kamala Harris are now doing more interviews. However, they still tend to do them with friendly outlets.

 

Walz’s interview with Shannon Bream on “Fox News Sunday”, where he was asked some real questions, wasn’t easy. They wanted to “do” Fox but didn’t send Kamala, so they chose Walz. He didn’t answer any questions and lied all the way. Shannon Bream rebutted him in this interview, unlike other interviews.

 

Don’t worry if you are worried about buying groceries. Tim Walz claims Kamala is a middle-class politician.

 

 

Translation? Translation? If you want to continue this for four more years, then vote for Biden and Harris.

 

Walz then lied when discussing tariffs and claimed that former President Donald Trump had wanted a 20% sales tax. Bream then slammed him, saying that if you were talking about tariffs you had kept Trump’s tariffs and added your own.

 

 

You can’t have both, because tariffs are only bad when they come from Trump.

 

Bream also exposed him on several points, including his blatant lies and/or incoherent statements about abortion.

 

Bream asked about the Minnesota law he signed, which had no restrictions for nine months. He said he and Harris wanted only Roe v. Wade to be restored. Bream tries to convince him that what he did went beyond Roe V. Wade and that Trump’s abortion position is a lie.

 

 

Bream decimated Bream over his comments about Amber Thurman. He said she died due to the side effects of the abortion pill, and that she did not receive the appropriate medical care promptly.

 

Bream asked why he had the language removed from a law that would have preserved life if a baby was born living.

 

 

He said it didn’t change anything, but it was just in line with the kind of care doctors are expected to give.

 

Why did you remove the ring? He didn’t know the answer.

 

Bream asked him also about his offensive statement that “anti-Israel protesters” spoke out for “all of the right reasons.”

 

 

What was his response? Oh, I did not mean those “pro-Hamas”. Why did you just say that without making any distinctions at all? You were trying to appeal to the radical left and you have been exposed.

 

She then asked the question that I believe everyone has about Walz. That is, why does he say so many things that aren’t accurate? She ran down the list, from IVF to his lies about his China trip and stolen valor. He called it “misspeaking.”

 

 

He claimed that he did not think people were interested, but then lazily tried to fabricate Trump’s position on IVF. He said he would not disparage anyone else’s military record or rank to avoid lying. He lied about his record. It’s not possible to cover up a habit of lying with the excuse that you “speak passionately,” particularly if you are lying, and he was being called out on it.

 

He said, “I will admit when I misspeak.” He didn’t because he continued to lie.

 

Bream then blew him out of the water over the border, when he claimed that Harris’ policies were the “strongest and fairest we have ever seen.” Bream shot down that claim, saying the majority of people view it as “an open border.”

 

 

He then tried to fall back on the bad law that they said they needed to do anything when Trump performed better than they did without it. They failed, of course, because they removed the protections that he had implemented when they first came into office. Biden-Harris had a much higher rate of illegal entry, and Trump constructed 450 miles worth of wall while Democrats tried to stop him.

 

Bream highlighted that the legislation they claim to support contains the wall they have disparaged. She pointed out that the bill he mentioned was only negotiated with a handful of Republicans and that many were against it. The bill was also shot down because it legitimized the influx of thousands of immigrants a day.

 

She then finished him, demonstrating how radical his Minnesota law was, providing free licenses, college, and health care to illegal aliens. Bream asked why taxpayers should pay for it, claiming that those magnets are not for illegal immigrants.

 

 

Walz denied that these were Harris’ positions, but he thought they were great. This was a ridiculous response.

 

Harris also said she supported free health care and decriminalizing of illegal immigrants. This was a good question by Bream, revealing how far left both were. He lied even about this:

 

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR